Alzheimers Disease Health Promotion Case Study :: Alzheimers Disease Essays

Introduction This section will discuss the impact of Alzheimer's disease on racial, cultural, and gender variables, with the focus being on the various approaches to care of the disease. Developmental stages and tasks will be discussed for both the client and the caregiver. Gender and Culture Alzheimer's disease and related dementias affect all races, ethnicities and cultures equally. (Anonymous, 1998) Of people over 65 an estimated 6-10% will be affected by some form of dementia. (Hendrie, 1998) It is only in gender where we see slightly more women than men who are affected by this destructive illness. (Lautenschlager et al., 1996) The only controllable risk factor that is known at this point is cigarette smoking. In a large study in Germany smoking cigarettes doubled the risk of dementia in the older population. (Ott et al., 1998) Alzheimer's disease patients can survive for 3-20 or more years. It is not the AD that kills the patient, rather it is diseases of aging and/or inactivity, with pneumonia being the leading cause at 70%. This is followed by heart disease, stroke, and cancer. (Thomas, Starr, & Whalley, 1997) Cultural Differences Race, culture, religion and ethnicity all play a part in how we care for our elderly. Each family makes decisions based on background, experience, expectations, knowledge base, and economics. Most people would like to be able to care for their aging parent or spouse with as little disruption to lifestyle as possible. Alzheimer's Disease, however, is a full time commitment, not just eight hours a day, but "24/7", as the current idiom implies, the patient needs continuous care. Sleep habits are disturbed, wandering is common, medications must be carefully controlled, safety is always important. Home care soon becomes frustrating and exhausting if left to one or two caregivers. When the primary caregiver has his/her own medical needs to see to, is also aged, or is the parent of young children as well, the burden can become overwhelming. In-home care is a possibility as is placement in a live-in facility, but both are expensive alternatives. In California ethnic minorities make up a large part of our population. In the book Culture and Nursing Care: A Pocket Guide, there are characteristics of these groups and generalizations are made about how they care for their elderly. (Lipson, 1996) The following table highlights some of these groups that are represented in the Bay Area. American Indian Status of "elder" begins in middle age.

Why did the Beatles and the Rolling Stones have such a great impact during the 1960’s?

In the early 60's and late 50's things changed people were more open to new ideas and T.V, fashion and Music became a very big part of life. They were all new and exciting and every young person wanted to be part of it. Music especially played a big part all that teenagers wanted to do was listen to music but this was made very hard for them there was no radio stations for them the had to listen to Radio Luxembourg which although played non-stop pop music kept cutting out after every few minutes the in 1964 a new pirate station was launched it was Radio Caroline It was a ship which was just outside British territorial waters and did the same as radio Luxembourg, played non stop pop music. Every teenager loved it but it was very unpopular with the BBC and the government and they tried to get it banned. There were British Pop acts though and two of the biggest were the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. When I say big I mean huge, I was born in 1988 about 25 years after the bands started out and I could quote you lyrics from some of their songs. People are still buying their music today and they are still acquiring new fans every year. The Beatles wee four Lads from Liverpool with very broad regional accents and they were Paul, Ringo, George and John. The Beatles were different they had different and new hairstyles and they wrote and performed their own music unlike so many other British acts. Many people didn't like them and saw them as an attack on the establishment. The Rolling Stones were Mick, Keith, Charlie and Bill. They were from London and they had their first hit in Britain in 1963 with Come On/I Wanna Be Loved. They also had a hit with a Beatles cover. They were known by the establishment as longhaired louts and had very much the same feedback from the public as the Beatles did although a lot of people would argue that they were worse than the Beatles. One person said that when they went to a Beatles concert they didn't hear one note all they could hear was the thousands of fans screaming. This was new no one had supported a band or musician like this before yes there had been strong followings for people before but nothing like that was seen at each bands concerts. At about the same time or just slightly before the same music phenomenon was happening in the USA with bands like the beach boys and the monkeys. British music was influenced by the US and a lot of people looked to the country as inspiration. Neither were instant hits though The Beatles had actually been a struggling band playing in clubs like the cavern, where they actually got discovered and the stones didn't get to number one until July 1964. As the years went on they got more drastic and the Beatles wrote songs which were obviously about drugs and this is why young people liked them because they weren't afraid to say what they wanted to which many teenagers wanted to but never could do before. I suppose our modern day answer to the Beatles would be someone like Eimenem. In the beginning of the 60's there was such an attack on the establishment and bands like the stones and the Beatles upheld this attack. They were people teenagers could follow and who their parents didn't really like, which for some made them like them even more. They weren't just pop stars to them, they were heroes. You could say well what makes them so different from every other band, what made them so special well one of the things for the Beatles was that they were one of the first, no other band was like them they were new, exciting and talented. A modern day example of how they become famous is the spice girls and I'm not comparing them on talent but when the spice girls came along there was no other proper girl band which is why thy were such a success. Lyrics were a big part of both bands they were new and inspirational and home-grown examples are â€Å"I can't get no satisfaction† from the Beatles and † I wish somebody'd come along and run into it and wreck it†. They also wrote their own lyrics. They were turned in Media Stars and they both were the first ever bands to be a hit in America no other bands were like them. They both had very good management which also helped them lots The Beatles had Epstein and the stones had Oldham both of whom were very good at their jobs and made stars out of both bands. Something that kept the Beatles and the stones in the charts was that they changed with the times, the sixties was all about that nothing stayed popular for very long but they changed as the time went to suit that months trend. The stones didn't change as much as the Beatles but from what they did I think they grew into it, I believe that the Beatles were managed into it but it made them a success, made them very rich and gave each one a chance at their own solo careers. They were legends, the two remaining Beatles now have been successful in their careers and even today the rolling stones are still performing and realising album the most recent one being 40 licks, which was a complete success and which I know of people my own age that brought the C.D so if they get that kind response in 2003 you can only begin to imagine what it was like in sixties how it made their fans feel how much impact they had on everyone whether they enjoyed their music or not.

Difference Between A Monopoly And A Perfectly Competitive...

â€Å"If you allow for a purely capitalistic society, without any type of regulation at all, you will get one monopoly that will eat all of the smaller fish and own everything, and then you ll have zero capitalism, zero competition - it would just be one giant company† (Tankian, S. n.d.). The preceding quotation from Serj Tankian lays the groundwork for this case assignment. An assignment that will analyze the differences of the demand curve facing both a monopoly and a perfectly competitive firm. Also, exploration will be performed that will uncover the items that will likely be produced under monopoly type of conditions. Followed by, a brief description of a monopoly I interact with a daily basis will be elaborated upon in this paper. Finally, it will be revealed on what type of firm has a zero economic profit in the long run. Let us commence by identifying the difference of a monopoly and a perfectly competitive firm. Demand curve differences: Prior to demonstrating the differences of demand curve facing a monopoly versus that of a perfect competitive firm. It may be prudent to define the term monopoly and a perfect competitive firm. With the assistance of various sources including the background materials, the manner in which I interpret a monopoly is as follows. It’s my understanding that a monopoly completely dominants production of a certain good or service with virtually no competition in a certain segment of the market. An example, of this is U.S. Steel fromShow MoreRelatedManagerial Economics Chapter 9 Essay1641 Words   |  7 Pagesmarket to be perfectly competitive? Many buyers and sellers, with all firms selling identical products, and no barriers to new firms entering the market. In perfectly competitive markets, prices are determined by The interaction of market demand and supply because firms and consumers are price takers. Price taker Buyer or seller that is unable to affect the market price. A buyer or seller that takes the market price as given When are firms likely to be price takers? A firm is likely toRead MoreEconomics and Demand Curve Essay645 Words   |  3 Pagesexpected average total cost C. the difference between expected average price and expected average total cost D. the difference between expected total revenue and expected total cost 15) If a firm in a perfectly competitive market experiences a technological breakthrough, A. other firms would find out about it eventually B. other firms would find out about it immediately C. other firms would not find out about it D. some firms would find out about it, but others wouldRead MoreExplain, and Illustrate Using Graphs, Whether You Think a Perfectly Competitive Industry or a Monopoly Industry Leads to More Efficient Outcomes for an Economy1740 Words   |  7 Pagesthink a perfectly competitive industry or a monopoly industry leads to more efficient outcomes for an economy. RESEARCH ESSAY Microeconomics is defined as a study of how economic decisions are made by individuals and groups along with the range of factors affecting those decisions. In relevance to this, the analysis of perfect competition and monopoly regarding efficiency is considered one of the most core basis to the understanding of Microeconomics. This paper argues that a perfectly competitiveRead MoreMonopoly and Perfect Competition1045 Words   |  5 PagesADP11/12/EX/MBA/0916 What is the difference between monopoly and perfect competition? Firm under perfect competition and the firm under monopoly are similar as the aim of both the seller is to maximize profit and to minimize loss. The equilibrium position followed by both the monopoly and perfect competition is MR = MC. Despite their similarities, these two forms of market organization differ from each other in respect of price-cost-output. There are many points of difference which are noted below. Read MoreClassification of Market Structure and Its Importance1552 Words   |  7 Pagesbe of following types. * Perfect Competition * Monopoly * Duopoly * Oligopoly * Monopolistic competition PERFECTLY COMPETITIVE MARKET In a Perfectly Competitive Market we have a large number of small firms producing identical products. As the number is large, each firm has no market power. That is they are driven by their rivals to a common price and that will be the equilibrium price in the market. If you are an individual firm in this market your individual demand curve looks likeRead MoreCompetition : A Theory Of Competition Essay1644 Words   |  7 Pagesof rivalry between firms for the patronage of customers. The European Commission defines competition as a situation in which firms or sellers â€Å"independently strive for buyers’ patronage in order to achieve aparticular business objective, for example, profits, sales, or marketshare†7. Richard Whish refers to competition in the commercial world as â€Å"a striving for the custom and business of people in the market place†8. In this sense, competition is the equivalent of rivalry between firms; this rivalryRead MorePure Monopoly in a Com petitive World Essay996 Words   |  4 Pagesworld, the perfectly competitive firm is considered the price taker, whereas the monopolistic firm is the price maker, meaning they have control over the price. Pure monopoly does exist in today’s business world; we all have had the opportunity to have personal dealings with such companies. This assignment will discuss the various degrees of â€Å"monopolies† and attempt to provide accurate examples, allowing me to share my understanding of the competitive business market. In a competitive businessRead MoreTopic: Profit Maximization of a Firm.1326 Words   |  6 PagesProject Topic: Profit Maximization of a firm. Profit maximization has always been considered the primary goal of firms.The firms owner is the manager of the firm, and thus, the firms owner-manager is assumed to maximize the firms short-term profits (current profits and profits in the near future).Today, even when the profit maximizing assumption is maintained, the notion of profits has been broadened to take into account uncertainty faced by the firm (in realizing profits) and the time valueRead MoreMarket Structure and Analysis 996 Words   |  4 PagesThere are a few different market structures, competitive market, monopolies, and oligopolies. According to Mankiw (2007) competitive market, also known as monopolistic competition or â€Å"perfectly competitive market† is defined as â€Å"a market with many buyers and sellers trading identical products so that each buyer and seller is a price taker† (Pg. 290). In this market structure there are two characteristics: there are many buyers and many sellers in the mar ket and the goods offered by the various sellersRead MoreThe Various Shades Of Monopolies And Perfect Competition1003 Words   |  5 PagesThe Various Shades of Monopolies and Perfect Competition Robert Sturdevant Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University â€Æ' Abstract Monopolies are always known to hold a limited amount of control over its particular market and that gives them the dominant ability to control the prices for its goods or services, or in other words, they represent the market. They indeed have detrimental effects on consumer and social welfare, which is why most do not agree with them. This paper is an attempt to address